Mark Sapiro writes: > And several years ago (in the 2.1.5 timeframe), RedHat modified their > Mailman package to be FHS compliant for the specific purpose of avoiding > SELinux security violations.
Is it possible FHS non-conformance is related to the OP's situation? Are we FHS conformant? If not, why would it be a bad idea to become FHS-conformant (aaside from the effort required)? ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
