Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> in today's team meeting, there were some issues where we would like your 
> input:
>
> * MAP-420 & MAP-443: what is the progress on proj4js, and what
> happened to the convergence errors?
>   
I managed to make some limited progress on this this weekend, adding 
support for the prime meridian initialization parameter, datum 
definitions, and trying to get a test suite of points running so we can 
detect if errors are happening (and there are a few, probably mostly 
related to datum transforms).  I have the modifications ready in the 
MapBuilder code, but I'm holding off committing until I'm sure proj4js 
is working correctly.
The convergence errors typically happen when a point is outside the 
extent covered by a projection.  A test case to make sure the errors can 
be ignored would be very helpful, but it's probably ok to ignore.

> * MAP-268: is this model used anywhere?
>   
ContextCollection is used in several examples, or at least it was.  It 
may be replaced by a generic model now.  My preference is to keep it in 
there so that it is more explicit in our config documents what the model 
is, where possible.  But it won't bother me to much to just replace this 
with the generic Model object.

> * MAP-235 & MAP-236: can you do a little work on those examples to
> make sure they are working well?
>   
I'll do my best to update those.  The context editor demo could possibly 
be replaced by the work LisaSoft did for the CGDI IP, although I'm not 
sure if that has all the same functionality.

Mike

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
mapbuilder-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel

Reply via email to