Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 01:31 +0100, Andreas Hocevar wrote: > I know there was already some discussion about this on the list. What > if we have the following in an OWS Context document: > > <Layer queryable="1" hidden="0"> > <Server service="OGC:WMS-C" version="1.0.0" title="OGC:WMS-C"> > <OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="/geoserver/wms?"/> > </Server> Just curious: do yo refer to WMS-C as a Tile Cache WMS or Component WMS? We so happen to be working with the latter for a project. I was curious if you've done something with that. Hmm, thinking of this: OGC will use the name WMS-C for Component WMS. This is where a lot of confusing will be introduced. How will we deal with this? > By the way, I have extended widget/GetFeatureInfoWSR.js, > model/OwsContext.js and tool/wfs_GetFeature to provide this simulated > wms:GetFeatureInfo using wfs:GetFeature, with a tolerance. See the > attached patch (note that the patch for GetFeatureInfoWSR also > contains some bugfixes). > > If you think that it is a good idea to do this, I would like to add > this to the trunk and the 1.5 release. Sounds like a very good idea. I have my concerns about the patch (and in fact, the original code in GetFeatureInfoWSR.js) in regards to the use of layerName... ;-) Would you like to change that yourself or shall I fix things in the trunk so you can create a new patch? Regards, Roald -- Roald de Wit Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commercial Support for Open Source GIS Software http://lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
