Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote: > Raj: this looks interesting. I think this is a great idea in terms of > reuse and mainstream integration. > > As well, > > ..Tom
Any thoughts about whether we can or cannot move some of this discussion to the OSGeo standards list? Regards, Arnulf. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Raj Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 20 February, 2008 6:36 PM >> To: Cameron Shorter >> Cc: Jody Garnett; Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]; >> mapbuilder-devel; openlayers; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [Context.RWG] WMC, OWS Context, and >> ContextCollection examples >> >> If you drop the ContextCollection format, and adopt Atom >> Collection (which is the same format as an Atom feed) you >> might lose a little bit of Context-centric descriptive >> richness, but you will gain a lot: >> 1. ability to subscribe to Collections in your RSS reader (or >> for developers, ability to re-use your RSS reading code) 2. a >> "free" publishing and update standard 3. a "free" >> categorization scheme >> >> I attach a sample Atom Publishing Protocol (APP) service >> document for an OWS Context Collection (file: >> context_service_document.xml) and a sample Collection >> document (file: context_feed.xml). >> >> What do you think of this idea? >> >> --- >> Raj >> > > _______________________________________________ > Context.rwg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
