I must agree here. QT looks a lot more attractive to developers thanks to the excellent documentation they have.
sri On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Shaun McCance <sha...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:37 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: > > Stormy Peters wrote: > > > + Identify our target audience(s). Do we want to communicate with > > > existing GNOME users, all free desktop users, or try to reach out to > > > non-free-desktop users? (I think we can safely leave communicating > > > with developers up to the developers themselves.) > > > + Identify our key messages. What's new/interesting/cool about GNOME > > > 3.0. Who will it benefit? How? > > > > I'd like to proffer an observation on the above two points: part of what > > people are talking about being cool about GNOME 3.0 is the developer > > platform being streamlined and modernized. Although we want to > > evangelise the benefits, the most powerful message wouldn't be GNOME > > saying that stuff (we would, wouldn't we?) but having a series of other > > projects saying that. > > It would *really* help to have top-notch developer > documentation to push our platform. I'm not talking > about API references here, though those are important > as well. I mean hands-on tutorials and conceptual > overviews. > > Our platform has been lambasted for having inadequate > documentation in the past. We have an opportunity to > overcome our previous shortcomings with a bang. Let's > not waste it. > > -- > Shaun (aka Mr. Broken-Record) > > > -- > marketing-list mailing list > marketing-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list >
-- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
