On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:01 -0400, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2011-04-23 06:36, Marc Paré a écrit : > > With the designing of different marketing materials for LibreOffice, I > > have created a wiki page listing the "Third Party Logos" weblinks[1] > > that you may want to include on your new designs. These include: > > > > * ODF logos > > * PDF logos > > * SVG logos > > * CC (Creative Commons) logos > > * LGPL logos > > * W3C Conformance logo (I don't think LibreOffice qualifies for this yet > > -- accessibility logo) > > > > The link also shows on the "Conference Kit" wiki page[2] > > > > Cheers > > > > Marc > > > > [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Third_Party_Logos > > [2] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/ConferenceKit > > > > > > Just to keep all of this in perspective. > > I created the page to make it easier for anyone needing to add the most > likely 3rd icons to marketing pages -- these links make it easier to > find the icons. On one of the discussion threads, it was commented that > one of these, the SVG icon license, seemed to be too restrictive and > that someone should contact the SVG group in order to clarify the > license permissions that accompanied it.
Just to clarify - the only issue is with packaging - use on a web page is specifically covered on the W3C site and does not require any contact with them for non-profits as long as one complies with the attribution requirements. I didn't look at the wiki page yet, if the link to the W3C page on this isn't there I'll add it later. Thanks Drew > I then modified and added a > temporary warning message until the SVG licensing issues could be > cleared up -- after which, the warning message would be removed. Drew > also suggested that perhaps a member of the SC could take up the task to > contact the SVG group to clear up the issues. > > Nothing else was intended other than to make it easier for all to find > and make use of these as needed and in all security of licensing > restrictions with respect to these icons. > > So, in order to finally clear all of this up, who would like to contact > the SVG group to clear this up? I also believe that an SC member should > be contacting the group so the the SVG group be made aware of their > "seemingly" restrictive license. Perhaps we are reading too much into > their license or perhaps they just need to modify their license and make > it a little more restrictive. We need to review all the licenses one > last time just to make sure that our use fall within their licensing > permissions. > > I'm sorry if this somehow seemed to be about any other issues. It wasn't > meant to be anything other than that of the above. > > Cheers > > Marc > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
