CB: Then WL proceeds to give _WL'S_ conception of CB's conception of the relations of production, in which WL at will and at his leisure sticks in all kinds of distortions and misrepresentations of what CB says, just as CB told WL a few days ago. Let me go back and find where told him that and he claimed he doesn't write big misrepresentations of what I say. WL is a liar.
*********** WL: Fine. What of the issues. I cannot understand what you write from your framework. Deal with the issue. What if I reproduce your exact description of relations of production as property as class rather than and contradistinction to what you call the technical shop floor? Comrade, one moment you are the self appointed designator of what is classical Marxism and the next moment you demand a thousand definitions to everything, which I provide, and then when we disagree you get hurt. I apparently have thicker skin. And of course I tend to speak with authenticity of experience and a verifiable record for what I write. From my standpoint you have not been able to understand dialectic and antagonism. I provided my source material. You simply view Marx one way and I another. I really evolved from another political current of history . . . really. Hell . . . Charles we even differ on the African American National Factor. And you did slip into a bunch of American exceptionalism and chauvinism. You are not the first and I have made similar mistakes in the past. Accept a mistake as a mistake and keep stepping. People do read this stuff and form their own opinions. Get some off-line comments. Waistline _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
