Marvin Gandall  
Fri Aug 29 08:24:57 MDT 2008 

Previous message: [Marxism] How Obama Blew It 
Next message: [Marxism] How Obama Blew It 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Artesian writes:
>
> Do I think nothing has changed since the "classic" era of Marxism? 
Better
> way to put it is-- has anything changed since the "classic" era of
> capitalism and the working class struggles of that era?  Indeed it
has.
> However, the fundamentals of capitalist accumulation remain the
> fundamentals
> of capitalist accumulation and that means the class struggle remains
the
> critical component in the social history, and future, of that
> accumulation.
> Do I know how to break through the layers upon layers of diversion,
> reaction, patriotism, prejudice, fear, ignorance that is secreted
around
> and
> in and through this struggle?  No.
>
> I do think that the bourgeoisie have been on an offensive for 35
years.
> Literally.  After the rate of profit dropped in 1969-70, the
bourgeoisie,
> led by the US bourgeoisie, geared up and by 1973 they were more than
ready
> to start hammering away at the living standards, gains, security of
the
> workers in the advanced countries along with the more bloody, brutal
> attacks
> on workers in Chile, Argentina for example.
>
> And I would like to point out, that this "gearing up" and this
assault did
> not go without responses in the advanced countries-- in the UK with
the
> end
> of the Heath govt. and its replacement by Wilson/Callaghan; in France
with
> the LIP strike; in Turin; in Portugal with the almost-revoution; and
in
> the
> US, starting as the bourgeoisie geared up with the postal workers
strike,
> the NYC transit strikes, combat (and there was combat) in the auto
> plants....
>
> Anyway that took us to... Thatcher, who could not have achieved power
if
> the
> Labor govt. before her had not eviscerated the workers' strikes in
the UK;
> Reagan and the lost decade around the world (except in China; and the
NIEs
> of Pacific Asia, where the OPEC price spikes, inflation, recession
> dislocated the existing agriculture/rural/economies precipitating
> migration
> to the cities)...
>
> I would also point out that the working class in the US is not my
father's
> working class.  It is female, it is immigrant, it is of color, it is
> non-union, it is employed in service and retail sectors (which does
not
> diminish the importance of the industrial workers); and so more than
ever,
> a
> "program" that empowers those workers to remedy discrimination in
all
> facets
> of society is the best, if not the only, way forward.
===========================================
This is a more serious reply than Louis' customary defensive
crankiness, as
was Jim F's brief cite of Engels. I can't see anything I don't
substantially
agree with.





This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to