======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


As a faculty member at Chico, I had only one conversation with Stan Cazier.
 It was quite weird.  A student, a nice guy, who came to my house a few
times, and who was in the Army reserves, approach me very nervously before
my class. He explained that I knew that he was in the engineering part of
the reserves and that he had some plastique explosives.  He wanted to know
what I think we should bomb. I told him I wasn't interested, but I related
my experience to Cazier.  His only reply was to ask me several times why I
was discussing bombs with my class. I got nowhere telling him that bombing
was not part of my classroom discussion, but I never got through to him.

He was a nice guy. Pretty ineffectual as a president. A devout Mormon, who
is not about to take any controversial positions on anything.

I also flew cross-country in a seat next to Del Gardner. He was very tied
in with California agribusiness interests. We spoke for a while, but we had
nothing in common other than our connections with the University of
California Berkeley.

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Dayne Goodwin via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
>
>
> Makes me think of a university administrator who was president of
> California State at Chico from 1971-1979 and president of Utah State
> University from 1979-1992.  Stanford Cazier was Vice-Provost at USU in 1970
> and was known as "the liberal' within the university administration when i
> met with him and asked him to sign a petition to the Nixon
> administration/attorney general to reconsider their refusal to let Ernest
> Mandel into the U.S.
>
> Cazier squirmed out of signing using the argument that because he wasn't an
> economist he didn't know anything about Mandel or his legitimacy.  If the
> chair of the Economics Deptartment, B. Delworth Gardner, would sign the
> petitiion, then he would, Cazier said.  I was back the same day with
> Gardner's signature on the petition but Cazier still refused to sign.
>
> In the fall of 1971 Cazier began his tenure as president of Cal State at
> Chico and i found myself working at the North California Peace Action
> Coalition office in San Francisco asking for funds and endorsement of the
> upcoming fall 1971 antiwar demonstration.  I took some pleasure in getting
> through all the secretaries and telling Cazier on the phone that i was
> Dayne Goodwin who had talked with him a year ago at USU about signing the
> petition for Ernest Mandel and i was calling to see if he would care to
> endorse and contribute to the upcoming antiwar demonstration.  He didn't
> hang up on me but of course he said no.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleindienst_v._Mandel
> http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1969/nov/20/the-mandel-case
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Cazier
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:37 PM, michael yates via Marxism <
> marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:
>
> > ======================================================================
> > Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> > ======================================================================
> >
> >
> > Professor Salaita has been dealt a serious blow, and he deserves whatever
> > support we can muster. I have been reading posts on some other lists
> about
> > what a pig Chancellor Wise is. No doubt true. However, I posted this to
> > another list,in the interest of telling the truth that all chancellors
> are
> > pigs:
> >
> >
> >
> > Top college administrators are no different than their corporate
> > counterparts. You have to jump through a lot of hoops to get these jobs,
> > and to do so, you either have to be a pig or willing to become one. I
> never
> > met a boss I liked, and my college bosses were no different. Whatever
> > academic values might be these days, you can be sure that administrators
> > almost always will be willing to compromise them or abandon them
> altogether.
> >
> > As tenure disappears, thanks in no small part to the many pigs among the
> > tenured faculty, especially those who lust after administrative posts,
> > academic freedom will disappear too. Constant struggles will be necessary
> > to achieve even the victories gained so far in the Salaita case. How
> often
> > will it be that a similar situation arises?
> >
> > In 45 years of teaching, I knew but a handful of principled faculty,
> > people who would make a personal sacrifice to uphold academic freedom,
> for
> > example, and not a single administrator. Right from the Chancellor down
> to
> > the department chairpersons. The default position for a "principled"
> > professor is to write a letter. So how likely are the necessary struggles
> > to take place?
> >
> > When the Yale workers went on strike, David Montgomery wouldn't even get
> > his mail on campus much less teach his classes there. He's unfortunately
> > dead.
> > ________________________________________________
> > Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
> > Set your options at:
> > http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/daynegoodwin%40gmail.com
> >
> ________________________________________________
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
> Set your options at:
> http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/michael.perelman3%40gmail.com
>



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to