********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

The Impossible “Honorable Compromise”
For Syriza, embracing an “honorable compromise” means abandoning the
platform that brought them to power.
by Stathis Kouvelakis
Jacobin magazine, May 25
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/05/greece-syriza-european-union-austerity-troika>
. . .
The break is in any case unavoidable. The choice is between a Kornilov
type of break and a Lenin type of break, in other words between a
counterrevolutionary coup and a radicalization of the revolutionary
process. Under these circumstances the search for a compromise would
mean political impotence, and impotence in such a polarized situation
means annihilation.
. . .
To put it somewhat differently: it is precisely because “compromise”
under present conditions is in practical terms impossible, that its
compulsive evocation obscures the actual issues, depoliticizing and
presenting them as a clash of ethical preferences: “realists” vs.
“hardliners,” “pragmatists” vs. “utopians,” and so on.

What is actually reflected in the current discursive struggle is that
“honorable compromise” is not possible because the prerequisites for
it do exist. The stronger party, the European Union, is not interested
in compromise but only in administering humiliation, which by
definition entails dishonor.
. . .
The shock therapy applied to Greece over the past five years is
nothing more than a radical (by the standards of a Western European
country) version of this same neoliberal counterrevolution. Those who
embody it, inside and outside the country, are executors of an
operation of plundering and naked subjection. They are at once violent
and vulgar, the antithesis of the type that would seek compromise. In
those conditions only the action of the oppressed can open up a
perspective of political, social, and ethical regeneration.

This presupposes a decisive reemergence of what Gramsci, quoting the
French Marxist Georges Sorel, called the “spirit of cleavage” of the
subaltern classes, their ability to break the ideological and ethical
hegemony of the dominant groups, to uncover the latent antagonism in
social relations and put forward their own world view and their own
“ethical reform.”

Only the cleavage is, in the here and now, “honorable” — precisely
because it is the vehicle for a break that is both the prerequisite
for and the harbinger of the radically new, uniting politics and
ethics in the struggle for popular emancipation.

_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to