******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************
NY Times, Dec. 29 2016
Germany Grapples With Its African Genocide
By NORIMITSU ONISHI
WATERBERG, Namibia — In this faraway corner of southern Africa, scores
of German soldiers lie in a military cemetery, their names, dates and
details engraved on separate polished tombstones.
Easily missed is a single small plaque on the cemetery wall that gives a
nod in German to the African “warriors” who died in the fighting as
well. Nameless, they are among the tens of thousands of Africans killed
in what historians have long considered — and what the German government
is now close to recognizing — as the 20th century’s first genocide.
A century after losing its colonial possessions in Africa, Germany and
its former colony, Namibia, are now engaged in intense negotiations to
put an end to one of the ugliest chapters of Europe’s past in Africa.
During German rule in Namibia, called South-West Africa back then,
colonial officers studying eugenics developed ideas on racial purity,
and their forces tried to exterminate two rebellious ethnic groups, the
Herero and Nama, some of them in concentration camps.
Germany Returns 20 Skulls to Africa SEPT. 30, 2011
“It will be described as genocide,” Ruprecht Polenz, Germany’s special
envoy to the talks, said of a joint statement that the two governments
are preparing. Negotiations, which began this year, are now also
focusing on how Germany will compensate and apologize to Namibia.
The events in Namibia between 1904 and 1908 foreshadowed Nazi ideology
and the Holocaust. Yet the genocide in this former colony remains little
known in Germany, the rest of Africa and, to some extent, even in
Namibia itself.
Throughout Namibia, monuments and cemeteries commemorating the German
occupiers still outnumber those honoring the victims of genocide, a
concrete reminder of the lasting imbalance of power.
“Some of us want to remove that cemetery so that we can put our own
people there,” said Magic Urika, 26, who lives about an hour away from
the cemetery here in Waterberg. “What they did was a terrible thing,
killing our people, saying all the Herero should be eliminated.”
While Germany’s efforts to atone for crimes during World War II are well
known, it took a century before the nation began taking steps to
acknowledge that genocide happened in Namibia decades before the Holocaust.
About 80 percent of all Herero, who numbered as many as 100,000, are
believed to have eventually died. Many perished after the battle of
Waterberg: They were shot, hanged from trees or died in the desert,
where the Germans sealed off watering holes and also prevented survivors
from returning.
Even after the centennial of the Namibian genocide in 2004, Germany’s
willingness to acknowledge it officially has proceeded so slowly — and,
to critics, grudgingly — that it has set off accusations of racism in
how the victims in Europe and Africa have been treated.
“The only difference is that the Jewish are white in color and we are
black,” said Sam Kambazembi, 51, a traditional Herero chief whose
great-grandparents fled during the genocide. “The Germans thought they
could keep this issue under the carpet and the world would never know
about it. But now we have made noise.”
But Mr. Kambazembi and other leaders are also quick to blame domestic
politics for the delay in recognition.
After Germany lost its African colonies during World War I, Namibia
slipped under the control of South Africa’s white-minority government
until 1990, largely making talk of the genocide taboo.
After independence, Namibia’s liberation party — South West Africa
People’s Organization, or Swapo — took over and governs to this day. But
it is dominated by the country’s main ethnic group, the Ovambo, and
critics contend that it showed little interest in bringing up the
genocide against the Herero and Nama.
The Swapo-led government has also depended greatly on foreign aid,
especially from its biggest donor, Germany.
For years, Mr. Kambazembi, a longtime member of Swapo, said he had
unsuccessfully pressed fellow party leaders to emphasize the genocide issue.
“They make as if they listen, but then maybe when they go, they say,
‘That one is a Herero’ — I don’t know,” he said.
Namibia was Germany’s most prized African colony, the one that attracted
thousands of German settlers, who grabbed land and cattle from local
residents.
That drew fierce resistance from the Herero, traditional cattle herders,
and the Nama. To quell it, Lothar von Trotha, a military commander who
had earned a fierce reputation in Germany’s possessions in Asia and East
Africa, was deployed to Namibia to lead the “Schutztruppe,” or
protection force.
In 1904, he issued a warning that “every Herero, with or without rifles,
with or without cattle, will be shot.” He said he would no longer take
in women or children, but “drive them back to their people or have them
shot.”
In 1905, Trotha issued a similar warning to the Nama, 10,000 of whom are
estimated to have died as a result.
Stories of the deaths in the desert were passed down quietly in Herero
families — usually around a fire at night.
Marama Kavita, 43, a Herero activist in Okakarara, a town about an hour
from Waterberg, said he heard stories from his grandmother, who fled to
what is now Botswana as a child during the genocide.
“Whenever I asked her about this, she always said a word or two, and
then started crying,” he said. “If you would see an old lady like that
crying, it also transferred to you that emotion, the hatred.”
Over the decades, Nama communities also kept alive the memories of the
genocide in cultural festivals, handing down songs about the war and
re-enacting wartime episodes, said Memory Biwa, a researcher at the
University of Namibia who has compiled an oral history of the genocide.
In Hoachanas, a desolate Nama town in central Namibia, memories center
on the concentration camp in Windhoek, the capital, where many of the
residents’ ancestors were taken.
“My grandfather used to tell me how they were kept in a sort of kraal,”
said Timotheus Dausab, 79, using the word for an enclosure for animals.
“Some came back, but many died there. My grandfather used to tell me how
cruel the Germans were. When he told us those stories, he would jump up
and stand straight, very aggressively. His face would get angry.”
Petrus Kooper, Hoachanas’s traditional chief, said that the loss of
lives, property and land during the genocide were still being felt in
his community, where there are no paved roads and many people live in
shacks.
“It is because of those wars that we live like this on this barren
land,” he said.
In a potential obstacle to the talks, some Nama and Herero leaders want
to negotiate directly with Germany for compensation. The Namibian
government, they say, will spread future money from the Germans to
unaffected ethnic groups or, worse, simply pocket it.
“We don’t trust our own government to negotiate on our behalf,” said
Ester Muinjangue, chairwoman of the Ovaherero Genocide Foundation.
Namibia’s special envoy to the genocide talks, Zed Ngavirue, said that
Herero and Nama officials were already involved and would continue to be
when Namibia receives compensation from the Germans.
“The method, the distribution will be done with the participation of the
community themselves,” said Mr. Ngavirue, who is Herero.
But the two sides have yet to agree on a compensation amount, or what it
should be called. Namibia speaks of reparations, but Germany rejects the
term.
Reparations would amount to acknowledging guilt under the 1948 United
Nations Convention on Genocide, the Germans say, adding that the
convention cannot be applied retroactively to past genocides. That is
also why Germany is refusing to negotiate directly with the Herero and
the Nama, because discussions would fall under reparations, said Mr.
Polenz, the German special envoy.
While Germany has directly paid victims of World War II in the past,
compensating descendants in Namibia would subject Germany and other
nations to an endless stream of new claims, Mr. Polenz said.
“Maybe even the United States would ask us now what to do with the
Indians?” he said. “You cannot restart history. You cannot rewind time,
not in your private life, not in public life.”
In Germany, the genocide in Namibia has been debated a couple of times
in the past year in the Bundestag. But in the country at large, the
genocide remains mostly unknown, unmentioned in German schools, just as
it is still largely unmentioned in Namibia’s classrooms.
“There is still a colonial amnesia,” said Reinhart Koessler, a German
historian and expert on Namibia.
In a visitors’ book at the Waterberg military cemetery, a German man
from Oldenburg wrote in English: “It hurts me that this cynical memorial
is left without an information about the genocide and with only a small
notice of the killed Herero people.”
--
Support Louis Proyect biography project
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/publish-the-biography-of-socialist-louis-proyect#/
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at:
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com