********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

This is what passes for a science article in  The Guardian doesn't surprise
me whatsoever. When you see that "“It would be quite fun to be on Mars
because you would have gravity that is about 37% of that of Earth, so you
would be able to lift heavy things and bound around,” you are dealing with
a lunatic "visionary". Mad indeed. How much fun would it be when your bones
start to break because they don't have the 100% needed gravity to insure
their health? Earth, with it's nickle-iron core, provides a huge absolutely
necessary shield against the massive solar and cosmic radiation that would
otherwise cook all life on Earth. Mars has no such nickel-iron core, and
thus no ionosphere to protect life on that planet.

If one is going to read a reasonable and informative vision of Mars
colonization, skip the idiot and former Trump advisor, Elon Musk, and read
the Kim Stanley Robinson series "Red Mars" "Green Mars" "Blue Mars". The
Guardian is poising as the "World News" of science. Elon Musk is their
mascot. Skip it.

David
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to