********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: H-Net Notifications <drupalad...@mail.h-net.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:47 AM
Subject: H-HOAC daily digest: 1 new items have been posted
To: "hasc.warrior.s...@gmail.com" <hasc.warrior.s...@gmail.com>


Greetings Andrew Stewart,

New items have been posted in H-HOAC.
Table of Contents

   1. Review: Frazier's The East Is Black: Cold War China in the Black
   Radical Imagination <#m_4866506961890496606_184348>

------------------------------
Review: Frazier's The East Is Black: Cold War China in the Black Radical
Imagination <https://networks.h-net.org/user/login?destination=node/184348>
by John Earl Haynes

*Robeson Taj Frazier.* *The East Is Black: Cold War China in the Black
Radical Imagination.* Durham: Duke University Press
<http://www.dukeupress.edu/>, 2014. 328 pp. $25.95 (paper), ISBN
978-0-8223-5786-5; $94.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8223-5768-1.

*Reviewed by* Joseph Parrott (Yale University/The Ohio State University)
*Published on* H-Afro-Am (June, 2017)
*Commissioned by* Jewell Debnam


Since W. E. B. DuBois defined the global color line as “the relation of the
darker to the lighter races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the
islands of the sea,” scholars have posited various
theories on the development of international solidarity.[1]. Pan-Africanism
has long dominated the literature, but in recent years scholarship on the
links between African and Asian diasporas has increased. Given differences
in language, culture, and geography, activists developed diverse networks
and  projects to achieve unity of purpose. In the mid-twentieth century,
radical African American activists looked to China for support and
inspiration to strengthen their struggles for equality during the Cold War.

In *The East is Black*, Robeson Taj Frazier seeks to recover the evolution
of Maoist China in the black radical imagination. He contends that African
Americans used their experiences traveling in the anti-imperial nation to
challenge the formulations of race and world affairs that motivated Cold
War politics. At the heart of Frazier’s study is the transnational exchange
of ideas, goals, and peoples that brought black Americans into direct
collaboration with China’s government. Mao Zedong sought to legitimize his
rule--domestically and internationally--by “constructing Chinese communism
as global capitalism’s antithesis” (p. 11). Given the close association of
capitalism with American preponderance, a prominent element of this
strategy included the exploitation and manipulation of the United States’
deeply contested race politics and its popular conceptions of China.
African American radicals who visited China as reporters, educators, and
exiles became central actors in this project. They found in Mao’s flexible
anti-imperial reading of Marxism an attractive alternative to the United
States’ systemic economic and social inequalities. These globe-trotting
foreigners adapted and disseminated Chinese communist ideals for
international consumption, even as they witnessed some of the limitations
of Mao’s domestic revolution.

Frazier focuses on six individuals, providing a detailed textual analysis
of their cultural production about China. During the 1950s, W. E. B.
DuBois, Shirley Graham DuBois, and reporter William Worthy all toured the
country, while Mabel Williams, Robert Williams, and educator Vicki Garvin
lived for extended periods in China in the 1960s. Frazier contends that
they came to understand the hardships faced by blacks in the United States
as inextricably linked to those of China by their shared participation in a
global “system of racial capitalism” based on white supremacy, unequal
wealth accumulation, privatization, and male dominance (p. 6). Travel and
travel narrative provided a conduit through which internationally minded
radicals could trade, negotiate, and disseminate political ideas. The
result was a direct challenge to the dominant Euro-American liberal order
that had long constrained the freedoms of nonwhites and defined identity
within strict national parameters. These new ways of viewing the world
expanded the political consciousness and imagination of African Americans
and, to a lesser extent, their East Asian hosts. For Frazier’s activists,
China became a template that offered “instructive principles and praxis for
making a U.S. revolutionary movement” (p. 34).

Frazier uses DuBois’s concept of “unity and variety” to explain this
radical transnationalism, which forms its identity less around sameness
than a pluralistic resistance to racial capitalism undertaken by the
long-marginalized colored peoples (p. 69). In particular, Dubois and the
Williamses articulated a decentralized solidarity based on literary and
aesthetic presentations of “a shared history of epistemic, ontological, and
bodily violence” and the common struggle against these trends (p. 150).
Frazier’s thoughtful formulation provides an important addition to recent
scholarly discussions of what might be termed the Third World Project, or
Tricontinentalism. Yet in contrast to more sweeping studies such as Vijay
Prashad’s *The Darker Nations* (2008), Frazier’s close textual analysis and
archival research provide an opportunity to unpack the contested politics
of representation and simplification that occur as part of these
transnational exchanges. In addition to China’s nativist traditions, *The
East is Black* reveals among other examples that the radical transnational
challenge to racial capitalism did not necessarily erase masculine
privilege, leading to different readings of Chinese politics by male and
female authors.

Unfortunately, Frazier limits himself by too narrowly concentrating on
travel literature. Deft analysis of written material far outweighs
attention to the reception of these texts in the United States or
elsewhere. Though the author certainly recognizes the need for such impact
assessment, his attention to the matter is often cursory. As a result, *The
East is Black* does not seriously explore Maoist China’s connections to
broader African American movements, despite Frazier’s previous engagement
with this topic.[2] Prominent organizations sympathetic to Maoism such as
the Black Panthers and the Marxist wing of the African Liberation Support
Committee make brief cameos, primarily in a “coda” devoted heavily to
Nixon’s rapprochement with China. This omission seems like a missed
opportunity not only because individuals such as Huey Newton visited China,
but because accessible publications such as *The Black Panther* and *African
World* discussed China and were influential in shaping African American
internationalist thought. Since Marxism--partially inspired by China--both
fueled and divided black activism from the late 1960s onward, greater
attention to African American responses to Eastern racial and ideological
formulations would have provided an important addition to the
internationalist historiography of the late civil rights and Black Power
eras.

Frazier’s emphasis may not be on the domestic contexts of either country,
but he does do an able job of capturing Chinese views of the global color
line, making his transnational history worthy of attention from scholars
outside African American studies. Too often in monographs on black or
ethnic internationalism, foreign actors appear as two-dimensional: exotic
tropes that American actors react to and against. Frazier’s linguistic
abilities and cultural sensitivities deliver a nuanced image of Mao’s
communist state that captures its ideals and contradictions as it pivoted
to claim leadership of the nonwhite world. Admittedly, Frazier utilizes
relatively few Chinese-language sources, but he marshals evidence from
expert monographs, translations, and both American and Chinese archives. In
so doing, he highlights the role of states in forging a radical Third World
solidarity, linking activist histories such as Judy Tzu-Chun Wu’s *Radicals
on the Road* (2013) and Laura Pulido’s *Black, Brown, Yellow, and Left* (2005)
with an expanding scholarship on global South diplomacy. The result is an
important study that sheds new light on how radical states worked with
transnational actors to challenge the Cold War, empire, and racial
inequality.

*The East is Black* helps expand the geographic and cultural boundaries of
scholarly understandings of the black radical imagination. Frazier’s
detailed analysis of the dynamic terrain of Third Worldism,
anti-imperialism, and black radicalism insightfully illustrates how African
Americans engaged with a fluid global color line in pursuit of a
transnational solidarity against white racial capitalism. The study is well
worth reading for scholars of African American politics and intellectual
thought, but should be equally rewarding for students of modern global
history and the Cold War.

Notes

[1]. W. E. B. DuBois, *The Souls of Black Folk *(New York: Oxford
University Press, 2007), 39.

[2]. Robeson Taj Frazier, “The Congress of African People: Baraka, Brother
Mao, and the Year of '74',” *Souls* 8, no. 3 (2006): 142-159.



<http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=45426>

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through
the network, at: https://networks.h-net.org/h-afro-am.

*Citation: *Joseph Parrott. Review of Frazier, Robeson Taj, *The East Is
Black: Cold War China in the Black Radical Imagination*. H-Afro-Am, H-Net
Reviews. June, 2017.
*URL:* http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=45426
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/> This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative
Works 3.0 United States License
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/>.

   - Read more or reply
   <https://networks.h-net.org/user/login?destination=node/184348>

Back to top <#m_4866506961890496606_topdigest>

[image: H-Net] Please help us keep H-Net free and accessible. $10 from each
of our subscribers would fund H-Net for two years. Click here
<https://networks.h-net.org/support-h-net> to make a tax-deductible
donation online.

Contact the Help Desk: h...@mail.h-net.msu.edu.
Manage notification settings by visiting *My Profile > Notifications* on
the Commons <https://networks.h-net.org/>.
[image: H-Net on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/HNet_Humanities> [image:
H-Net on Facebook]
<https://www.facebook.com/humanities.socialsciences.online>



-- 
Best regards,

Andrew Stewart
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to