********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

I thank my friend Louis for recognizing that I have been consistent, albeit not in the way he means.

I can't remember how many times I've said for many, many years that what one does in relation to "bourgeois-democratic electoral farces" is a tactical question. I've evolved, however.

I'm sure that I never said before the last couple of years what I now believe: that the Democratic Party has become one very important arena of a movement by working people to constitute ourselves as an independent political force. I never said it because I would have rejected it automatically without a second thought, as I think Louis does (and most comrades on this list, especially those who shared at least part of my political journey since the end of the 1960s).

I say it now not because it is something I've ever expected or advocated, but because I think it is an accurate description of reality. That reality emerged during the first months of Bernie's primary campaign against Clinton, when what was clearly intended to be a symbolic challenge to raise important issues was transformed into a very real fight by this motion among working people.

Whether it is a mistake, something that can never work in a million years and will wind up being a trap are things I've thought long and hard about. But I really and truly believe that is what is going on --working people groping their way towards cohering as a "class for itself"-- and even if this way of doing it is 1,000% wrong, the role of Marxists is not to denounce the contradiction but to work in and through it to a resolution.

I think Engels's comments on the Henry George campaign in the 1880s are applicable here. I wrote a couple of posts explaining how and why I think that a few months ago and they are here:

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, superstar: what Engels would have said about it
http://hatueysashes.blogspot.com/2018/08/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-superstar-what.html

The Democratic Socialists, the Democratic Party, and the tactic of critical support
http://hatueysashes.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-democratic-socialists-democratic.html

*  *  *
Louis also sent a second response quoting something I wrote 11 year ago saying I expected Obama to deliver on immigration reform, as he was promising during the campaign, but how much he would deliver was up in the air. Clearly, I was wrong. I think Louis's post is mean to show I'm not sure what on what is going on around Bernie and AOC today.

I now think that the ruling class has adopted the de jure status of the undocumented as a sort of untouchable *caste* as an enduring part of neoliberal American capitalism. I wish I could say I've figured this all out but I haven't. But the main reason I've drawn that conclusion is that, *on the ground* the Bush, Obama and Trump policy towards the undocumented use essentially the same methods seeking to create the same effect, as I explain in more detail here:

Trump's real program: not deporting immigrants, but keeping them 'illegal'
http://hatueysashes.blogspot.com/2018/11/trumps-real-program-not-deporting.html

And, BTW, this all started under Clinton.

I think there is a need for a lot more thought an analysis about what is going on, in terms of the structure of U.S. society and its working class.

On 3/4/2019 7:41 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:
If nothing else, Joaquin is consistent. From 2008:
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to