In a message dated 7/3/2008 4:18:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Waistline's running the 7-minute mile through the M-L classics and delivering some real gems, like this one:
"Imperialism as a curve of history is not simply Empire but generally the export of a more advance productive and social relations to less developed areas." Oh, really?!?!?!?!?!? I am confident the peoples of the Indian subcontinent would have some points of disagreement with you about the "more advance [sic] productive and social relations" that the British Raj exported among them, like shopping off the right thumb of the muslin weavers of Bengal at different times during the 18th and 19th century so the Lancashire textile factory owners wouldn't have to worry about competition from higher quality product. Comment Really Naval power. This is what I wrotew and I will show what you wrote I wrote. >> Imperialism as a curve of history is not simply Empire but generally the export of a more advance productive and social relations to less developed areas. That is why it is imperialism. Empire conquers because it has weapons and superior organization. These superior weapons are the result of advanced production technique and its corresponding organization. << This line of argument is concrete. Listen to what you said I wrote . "Imperialism as a curve of history is not simply Empire but generally the export of a more advance productive and social relations to less developed areas." You forget the means by which people are conquered. You forget your Marxism. WL **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) _______________________________________________ Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list
