Yep, I figured it was a stupid question.  I had no idea you could do the
variable timeouts with diald.  I can definitely find a use for that too.
Guess I'll have to reinstall diald...

Thx,

Cy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Oehser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 1998 9:25 AM
> To: Cy
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] [masq] pap login fails when nameserver
> traffic cause
>
>
> Thanks for using NetForward!
> http://www.netforward.com
> v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
>
>
> Personally, I use it because it is there, and it works, and I have no
> reason to take it out.  Can pppd keep the link up 5 minutes after an http
> packet but only 1 minute after an ftp packet?  _I_ _don't_ _think_ _so_!
>
> That said, since I nailed my link up, I have no reason to keep it.
>
> -Tom
>
> On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Cy wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 03:30:36 -0600
> > From: Cy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:  [masq] [masq] [masq] pap login fails when
> nameserver traffic cause
> >
> > I have (probably) a dumb question.  Why do people use DIALD when PPPD
> > provides demand dialing?  Just curious...
> >
> > Cy
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Charles Shoemaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 26, 1998 10:27 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] pap login fails when nameserver
> > > traffic cause
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for using NetForward!
> > > http://www.netforward.com
> > > v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
> > >
> > > My recommendation (2 cents worth) is to get rid of that "modem,"
> > > which is causing all that grief, and spend around $300 to get an
> > > entry-level isdn router.  I hear good reports, from my ISP at least,
> > > about the Netgear 328 and 348.  No more hassles with serial ports
> > > supporting baud rates, NO MORE DIALD!  I haven't got any hands-on
> > > time with the models I mentioned, yet, but I have an installation
> > > coming up soon, and I expect it to go smoothly.  From what I've seen
> > > of the manuals of these products, all incoming traffic can be routed
> > > through your masq box, giving you, in effect, a second layer of
> > > firewall protection.
> > >
> > > More details as soon as the phone company gets its act together, and
> > > lets us do the install.
> > >
> > > > Date:          Sat, 26 Dec 1998 17:05:36 -0800
> > > > To:            Fuzzy Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > From:          Stefen Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Subject:       Re:  [masq] [masq] pap login fails when
> > > nameserver traffic causes diald to bringup link
> > >
> > > > At 09:20 PM 12/23/98 -0600, Fuzzy Fox wrote:
> > > > >David A. Ranch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >1) The 16650 serial <-> modem isn't reliable at 230400
> (using cable
> > > > >> >   supplied with modem.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've heard that Linux's setserial has problems with 16650s.
> > > > >
> > > > >I don't know about this, but I do know that a 16650 is not
> supported by
> > > > >Linux 2.0, unless you have some patches I don't know about.  I
> > > am forced
> > > > >to run Linux 2.1, which has full support for the 16650.  Not that
> > > > >there's anything wrong with the 2.1 kernel; it works just
> fine for me.
> > > > >
> > > > Sounds like I need to move to the 2.1 kernel... I was
> > > > putting off having to learn ipchains.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >   Stefen
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > "Some people crave baseball - I find this unfathomable - but I can
> > > easily understand why a person could get excited about playing a
> > > bassoon."  --  Frank Zappa
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to