On Jul 20, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > However, I have seen a real shift on the numpy list over the last year > (or two), toward using the namespace.
Yes, I do that to, primarily in scripts. However, for interactive sessions, I usually import into the top namespace. I imagine others might as well. Particularly people coming from environments like matlab will initially want everything up top. Separate namespaces are great. I still think from pylab import * should not overlap with from numpy import * I don't think it would be hard to make sure that there are no duplicate function names in the top namespace. E.g., mpl load could be put in mpl, matplotlib, or mpl_io, or something similar. People will migrate to separate namespaces eventually, as they get more familear with python, but they will be annoyed initially with any overlaps. -Rob ---- Rob Hetland, Associate Professor Dept. of Oceanography, Texas A&M University http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob phone: 979-458-0096, fax: 979-845-6331 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel