On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Forrester <kurtforres...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Just to add one more query to the thread, do you consider a point on a > vertex of the axes to be a candidate for annotation without clipping? That > is to say if there is a point (0,0) I wish to annotate, and the origin of > the axes contains that point (0,0), would you (by design) want to be able to > annotate that point? My initial uncertainty as to why I need to have the > clipping turned to False in the first instance is because I thought that if > a point may fall on a any of the vertices they still should be considered > in the visible field. >
I would agree with you. However, the current behavior inherits from how "inside test" is done for paths in general (point_in_path_impl in src/_path.cpp). So there is not much thing I can help. We may check if the point is "on" the path addiitionally, but I'm not sure if there is a relevant routine (while there is point_on_path, but I'm not sure if this is it). I'll try to take a further look later. Regards, -JJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
