> From: Guy Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I've just sent the patches to you.

Thanks!  We'll get these features integrated into Maverick 2.0 before
the next beta.

> > Good idea.  Out of curiosity, what servlet container are you using
that
> > doesn't unpack war files?
> 
> As far as I understand tomcat 4.0 can be configured to either run the
.war
> files directly or to unpack them.  I'm not sure which is the best
> approach!

I would expect that from a performance perspective, unpacking it would
be the best option.  I didn't know that leaving it packed was an option;
by default it unpacks the war.  Tomcat seems to have some issues
recognizing when the war file has changed, so maybe leaving the war
intact is the best option for development.

> I actually used getResource() which returns a URI and so via the
> URLConnection has a modification timestamp.  But to be honest, the use
of
> getResource() is a recent change and it hasn't yet been fully tested
that
> the XSL transformations get correctly recomputed if they are modified.

Cool, I'll look into it before I commit any changes.

Thanks!

Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Mav-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user

Reply via email to