It would have to be voted on by the three committers, but if you come up with something elegant it would probably be ok. Jim, Scott, do you have any thoughts?
It might be worthwhile to make the controller management a pluggable module. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Shackelford, John-Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:06 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Mav-user] controller chaining; #4 & RFC > > Jeff, > > As I am digging through the code and starting in on this > ChainingController > I have described, I am beginning to doubt that a controller is really the > best extension point for this functionality since it duplicates much of > what > other parts of the system are already doing. Perhaps this is really a > special type of command--one that has multiple controllers instead of a > single one. Would you consider patches if I were to try to implement it as > such? > > > John-Mason Shackelford > > Software Developer > NCS Pearson - Measurement Services > 2510 North Dodge St. > Iowa City, IA 52245 > 319-354-9200x6214 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ************************************************************************ ** > ** > This email may contain confidential material. > If you were not an intended recipient, > Please notify the sender and delete all copies. > We may monitor email to and from our network. > ************************************************************************ ** > ** > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com [INVALID FOOTER]
