What a great idea. I suspect will increase speed! Peter
At 23:39 10/02/2003 +0100, you wrote: >Hi all, > >Say, I have got a view like: ><view name="simpleReport" type="redirect" path="showSimpleReport.m"/> (I use >.m for Maverik commands). The current version of Maverik does a normal >redirect (response.sendRedirect). Imho it would be great if Maverik would >recognize that it is about to redirect to another Maverik command, and >instead of doing a real redirect, call that other command. And instead of >making a string copy of the objects in the context (stored like >getCtx().setParam(blah, obj)) to request parameters, make (or keep) the >objects available in their original form. > >I have got the case that I want to do a redirect to another command. For >this other command I have some object (which is not of type string!) >available in my first/ calling command. Right now the only way that I can >expose arbitrary objects from the first command to the second command is by >using session objects (or something similar), which is not *that* handy. > >Besides my own little problem (I already implemented the workaround), I >think doing a 'server side' redirect is better because it saves a >client-server roundtrip. Better because it it more efficient, and because it >does not expose variables meant for internal use (which is allways the case >if command1 calls command2?). > >Well, what do you all think? > >Cheers, > >Eelco Hillenius > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >[INVALID FOOTER] > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com [INVALID FOOTER]
