> From: Roman Petrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > What people think about this post? > http://lists.ourshack.com/pipermail/templates/2002-November/003974.html > > I think it's incorrect to say MVC for any web framework. > WebMVC?
Yeah, applying the MVC pattern to a web application is necessarily a bastardization of the Smalltalk concept. That's why I think it's funny when people argue about whether Struts or WebWork or Maverick or whatnot is more "philosophically pure" MVC. You can't implement Observable on the web. Still, while mapping MVC into the web world is not exact, it is analogous enough to be useful. Fat client developers may deplore the fact, but the term MVC is stuck in web vernacular and isn't going to go away. Yes it means something slightly different depending on the context. Oh well. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com [INVALID FOOTER]
