Yes, please - but in version 2.3.  I'd like to avoid making any invasive
changes this time around.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shackelford, John-Mason
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:24 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Mav-user] [PROPOSAL] Release v2.2.0 of Maverick
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> Would my controller chaining patch be more likely to make it in if I
> extend
> it to include a plugable architecture for Commands following the
patern
> for
> Views?
> 
> 
> John-Mason Shackelford
> 
> Software Developer
> Pearson Educational Measurement - eMeasurement Group
> 
> 2510 North Dodge St.
> Iowa City, IA 52245
> ph. 319-354-9200x6214
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://etest.ncspearson.com
> 
> 
>
************************************************************************
**
> **
> This email may contain confidential material.
> If you were not an intended recipient,
> Please notify the sender and delete all copies.
> We may monitor email to and from our network.
>
************************************************************************
**
> **
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> [INVALID FOOTER]



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
[INVALID FOOTER]

Reply via email to