My .02 cents: I, too, would like to see it facilitated by jakarta. To me, jakarta carry's the opensource world's equivalent of the major commercial guys stamp of approval. Looking at the activity on this list it doesn't appear to me that too many people are actively using Maverick and probably for the same reason that I have which is the support from some larger group, regardless of quality of the product.
Anthony > jm> I've been giving this idea of mav merging with struts some thought and > while jm> I agree with Jeff's doubt that "Maverick-as-Struts-2.0 will ever > happen, > > Good political idea. However I think adding Struts compatibility to > the Maverick will corrupt many "right things" in the Maverick > architecture. IMHO Maverick should be moved to Jakarta and evolves > as Struts competitor. > > Poma. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Caffeinated soap. No kidding. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Mav-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user > Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Caffeinated soap. No kidding. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mav-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/
