Although your example probably explains it all, I felt this for me was easier to understand:
http://hibernate.bluemars.net/51.html ___ SIMEN BREKKEN / in his prime. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Hibernate questions Here is one solution that I posted to the Hibernate wiki: http://hibernate.bluemars.net/43.html I think they changed the configuration mechanism since I wrote that, so you may have to adjust it slightly. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Simen Brekken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mav-user] Hibernate questions > > I am still a bit unclear on what the best approach to this might be, if > anyone has any examples I'd be very grateful > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Schnitzer, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:55 AM > Subject: RE: [Mav-user] Hibernate questions > > > > From: Simen Brekken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I was wondering if there's anyway of performing the expensive > Hibernate > > initialization steps (init datastores, setup factories) somewhere > other > > than > > perform using a ThrowAway controller. > > Create an Initialize servlet that is load-on-startup'd before everything > else. You can store datastores, factories, etc in the application > attribute context or just as static members of the Initialize servlet. > > > Also, what's the benefit of using a ThrowAway over a singleton > controller? > > I think this is really just a question of taste. For many simple > applications, the ThrowawayBean controllers are an easy way to build a > lot of program logic with a single class. However, when you find that > you have a common form used in different commands, the inheritance chain > this requires tends to get ugly. It is often more convenient to use a > FormBeanUser style of controller in this case. > > In CVS right now there are two versions of friendbook-jsp, one which has > ThrowawayBean2 controllers and one which has FormBeanUser controllers. > > Personally my preference has been to use ThrowawayFormBeanUser as a base > controller class - it provides the best of both worlds, IMHO. > > Jeff Schnitzer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > [INVALID FOOTER] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ [INVALID FOOTER] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ [INVALID FOOTER]
