I did a small investigation of Maven recently and decided to stick with vanilla Ant. Although I'd heard good things about Maven it didn't leave me with warm feelings. I didn't find it intuitive and I couldn't get it to work out of the box. Can we just stick with some good Ant scripts?
Ed. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 3:27 PM Subject: [Mav-user] Re: [Mav-cvs] maverick CHANGES.txt,1.34,1.35 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Update of /cvsroot/mav/maverick > > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv6420 > > Ahhh, that's better. :) > > Meanwhile, > > Does anyone have any strong negative feelings toward Maven? > <http://maven.apache.org> > > It's been spreading like Borg lately. I haven't had to use it much > myself yet, but the handwriting is on the wall, and so I'm reconciling > myself to the inevitable. :) > > If there weren't any objections, I thought I might try setting up the > appropriate configuration files. This would not disturb anything we have > now, only provide an alternative build/documentation mechanism. If we > like it, we could then keep it and use it for 2.2.1/2.3. Otherwise, I'll > retract it. > > -Ted. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > [INVALID FOOTER] > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 [INVALID FOOTER]
