On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Jeremiah Foster wrote:

> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Chad Spears wrote:
> 
>> I think that if anybody does, they need to speak up.
> 
> I think I have made myself perfectly clear, but I am more than willing to 
> state my position again: MeeGo infrastructure should reflect MeeGo itself and 
> be built with OSI approved licensed software. 

Except, well, MeeGo isn't really anything like the creature you seem to be 
imagining it to be. There's plenty of proprietary stuff in MeeGo, and I believe 
it'll be a strong platform for it given the realities of living in an imperfect 
world (where open-source alternatives aren't better simply because they're open 
source).

Following similar practices for the infrastructure of using proprietary stuff 
where it makes sense to seems like a reasonable thing to me. Pragmatism tends 
to get you farther than idealism. ;)
_______________________________________________
Meego-community mailing list
Meego-community@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community

Reply via email to