>________________________________________ >From: Arjan van de Ven [ar...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:59 PM > >On 10/25/2010 4:06 AM, jarmo.k...@nokia.com wrote: >> Hi, >> We have discussed about hardfp (and other) support in the toolchain team. >>Current assumption is that hardfp will be used in MeeGo 1.2. But there are >>still quite many other things to be agreed also - regarding different compiler >>options and switches, etc. Those different options are currently investigated >>and >> target is to get default settings for them, i.e. what options are used and >> how. > >breaking ABI like this goes way beyond the toolchain team. >Really. > >I would expect the TSG to have a lively debate about such ABI breaks and >make the final decision... this is not something that is done lightly, since >all ISVs are completely impacted by this.
Arjan, give me a break, will you. I would like to see Intel opposing that we are proposing to break ABI on ARM side .. You will likely have good laughs instead. Of course this needs to be elevated, and properly communicated as well. Hopefully already on 1.1 release material. Br, //Harri _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
