[Adding meego-qa@ to CC as it should handle this IMO.]
Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 10:59 +0100 schrieb Carsten Munk:
> What I personally think should be done is simply by having a public
> written policy how to deal with matters like:
>
> * Security sensitive bug reports
> * Developers/testers/whatever contributing copyrighted information
> that he has no right to, either as patches, bug report information,
> etc.
Such a public policy (who to set it up on the MeeGo wiki? QA team?)
should also define when to completely block access to a report and when
to just mark specific comments as private (so they are not visible for
non-admins).
Blocking access to a report might make sense when the bug summary
already contains sensitive information.
However the default should be to only mark specific comments as private
in case they contain
* copyrighted information
* non-public hardware information of MeeGo stakeholders
* spam advertisements for websites or non-MeeGo products
* insults towards other users
* (on specific request of the commenter:) content that makes the
commenter appear in a bad light (commenter identity in
combination with accidentially posted content like porn movie
file names in .xsession-errors output etc).
andre
--
Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster)
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-qa mailing list
MeeGo-qa@lists.meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
