On 12 September 2016 at 15:35, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Keeping diff/patches in git always felt like a hack, imho. Plus >> most/all(?) distros rely on the Mesa headers, so I'm not sure how that >> is going to work. > > The alternatives are considerably more painful for just a handful of > files with a small number of diffs. This would be as a tool for > developers like us who update the mesa versions by importing new KHR > versions, which will not have our local changes applied. The patch > would not be used as part of the build process or anything else. > The goal being to have the patches alongside the patched headers. This way one can use them as reference ? Sure sounds great imho.
Fwiw it may be that the EGL diff gets sorted sooner than expected /me crosses fingers. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev