On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 17:43 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 28 April 2017 at 16:00, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 19:38 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > > > > > > Split the target to allow faster builds for each run. > > > > > > The overall build time will be more, yet Travis runs multiple builds in > > > parallel so we're limited by the slowest one. > > > > > > Things are split roughly as: > > > - DRI loaders, classic DRI drivers, classic OSMesa, make check > > > - All Gallium drivers (minus the SWR) alongside st/dri (mesa) > > > - The Vulkan drivers - ANV and RADV, make check (anv) > > > > I think it would be better to split ANV and RADV on different builds > > too. > > > > Any particular reason why?
Just that, they are under heavy development (not that the rest of the mesa isn't, to be honest), and with so many changes coming in I would rather have a build that, if failing, I will know straight away whether it is radv or anv. A matter of taste, in any case ... -- Br, Andres _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
