On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 19:27 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 28 April 2017 at 19:15, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28 April 2017 at 11:50, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > > > Do we want to do this? > > > > > > According to Travis own doc, there is little to no gain: > > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/#Things-not-to-cache > > > > > > > The packages we use should not be slow to download, although I've not > > checked explicitly. It seems counter intuitive to explicitly add apt > > caching as an option yet advice against it :-\ > > > > Let's me give it a spin and see what happens. > > > > Using apt cache is a clear win - not huge one but still. > > "make loaders/classic DRI" - 1s > "scons SWR" - 6s
Let's keep the patch, then. This is: Reviewed-by: Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> -- Br, Andres _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
