On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01.05.2018 22:48, Marek Olšák wrote: > >> +**nr_color_samples**: This is the number of color samples for >> EQAA, while >> +``nr_samples`` is the number of coverage samples. If the format >> is Z/S, >> +``nr_color_samples`` is ignored. Constraints: >> +* ``nr_color_samples`` must not be greater than ``nr_samples``. >> +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is equal to ``nr_samples``, it is >> called MSAA. >> +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is less than ``nr_samples``, it is >> called EQAA. >> +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is equal to 1, the behavior of the >> resolve blit is >> +driver-dependent. >> >> >> Why the last buller? >> >> >> Because we can support N >= 2 coverage samples and 1 color sample. >> > > Okay, but for EQAA the behavior of the resolve blit is driver-dependent > also when there are >= 2 color samples, because you can still have samples > whose color fragment was discarded. > Yes. Marek
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev