On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaeh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01.05.2018 22:48, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
>>         +**nr_color_samples**: This is the number of color samples for
>>         EQAA, while
>>         +``nr_samples`` is the number of coverage samples. If the format
>>         is Z/S,
>>         +``nr_color_samples`` is ignored. Constraints:
>>         +* ``nr_color_samples`` must not be greater than ``nr_samples``.
>>         +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is equal to ``nr_samples``, it is
>>         called MSAA.
>>         +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is less than ``nr_samples``, it is
>>         called EQAA.
>>         +* If ``nr_color_samples`` is equal to 1, the behavior of the
>>         resolve blit is
>>         +driver-dependent.
>>
>>
>>     Why the last buller?
>>
>>
>> Because we can support N >= 2 coverage samples and 1 color sample.
>>
>
> Okay, but for EQAA the behavior of the resolve blit is driver-dependent
> also when there are >= 2 color samples, because you can still have samples
> whose color fragment was discarded.
>

Yes.

Marek
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to