Adam, which is the status of this patch? Is this effectively dropped? On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 16:13 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 15:01 -0500, Ian Romanick wrote: > > On 12/06/2017 10:32 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > On 5 December 2017 at 16:10, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > This extension is not defined for indirect contexts. Marking it as > > > > "client only", as the old code did here, would make the extension > > > > available in indirect contexts, even though the server would certainly > > > > not have it in its extension list. > > > > > > > > Cc: <mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > > > > > > Unrelated: reportedly only cairo is using the extension, so could we > > > consider the extension obsolete? > > > > It's not too surprising that only Cairo is using it. IIRC, Eric > > specifically made this extension for Cairo, and it was a pretty big perf > > win at the time. > > I think at this point most of the effect could be achieved with no- > flush contexts, but yeah. > > > I had wanted to test this patch, but... does LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=y > > just not work any more? With the distro Mesa I get: > > It works, that's the server telling you it doesn't support indirect > rendering. We turned that off by default a few releases ago as being > slow and underfeatured and CVE-prone. Start your server with +iglx or > with this in xorg.conf: > > Section "ServerFlags" > Option "IndirectGLX" "true" > EndSection > > - ajax > _______________________________________________ > mesa-stable mailing list > mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable -- Br,
Andres
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
