On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:05 PM Mathias Fröhlich <mathias.froehl...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi Marek, > > On Tuesday, 23 April 2019 20:22:15 CEST Marek Olšák wrote: > > I'd like to remove swrast from devices. It doesn't work (eglInitialize > > fails) and I don't think I like swrast there. Any objections? > > Yes, how do you guarantee that at least one device can be returned > in any case? Even if no drm device is found? > The egl device query extension guarantees that there is at least one > device available. > Beside that swrast may make sense for itself, that is the reason > the swrast device is there. > If no device can be returned, the extension won't be exposed. OR If there is at least 1 drm device, swrast won't be in the list. >From my perspective, radeonsi is always in the list and I wouldn't like swrast to be in the list if radeonsi is in the list. Marek
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
