Hello all, This is an old question that I had laying around - why doesn't mesa use a more conventional numbering for the development/rc releases ?
Eg. mesa 10.4.0-rc1 -> 10.3.99.901 mesa 10.4.0-rc2 -> 10.3.99.902 ... mesa 10.4.0 -> 10.4.0 mesa 10.4.1-rc1 -> 10.4.0.901 ... you get the idea. Afaics most freedesktop project use it plus a big hunk of gnome. Are there any objections if I move to the above format starting with mesa 10.4-rc1 ? I would appreciate any feedback over the next 2-3 days, and based on it I'll tag the first RC. The plan is to still keep the branch point later on today, but to push the tag on Monday. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev