Yep, and I can't understand this fad for claims that go along the lines of 'we 
have found the building blocks of life' , even yesterday the BBC announced that 
NASA had found 'building blocks of life' on Mars in the latest Rover sample, it 
turned out the BBC meant Hydrogen and Oxygen! - What Hydrogen/Oxygen in space? 
Wow there's a revelation - NOT!

And Amino acids are not 'the building blocks of life' either, they are nothing 
like, they form quite naturally without ANY life being present.

I never seen any evidence that life needed to seeded from outside the Earth, 
every shred of evidence we have implies life as we know it started right here. 
We could very well be the only life in the universe for all we know (although I 
find that statistically unlikely).
 
It's like the search for water on Mars, all very interesting but I bet there 
are millions of planets in the universe with liquid water, and I'd bet most of 
them don't have any life on..

Mark






-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com 
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Galactic 
Stone & Ironworks
Sent: 12 March 2013 19:40
To: Count Deiro
Cc: Mike Groetz; Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Astrobiologists Find Ancient Fossils 
inFireballFragments

Hi Count, Phil, List, and Innocent Bystanders,

I have to chime in a bit here on a more serious note.

I think there is merit to the idea of panspermia.  I am not convinced that 
panspermia explains any of the lifeforms or living processes here on Earth, but 
that does not mean the idea is baseless.

We have been bombarded for billions of years by objects that contain water and 
the precursors of organic compounds, amino acids, etc.
Injecting this material into the crucible of primitive Earth could result in 
changes to the evolution of life that would not have occurred without the 
addition of those extraterrestrial ingredients.
We may owe our existence to comets and meteorites.  Or maybe not.

But, the most fervent proponents of the panspermia theory are throwing caution 
and scientific method to the wind.  They look for evidence to support their 
views and they find it.  They selectively ignore valid questions about their 
methodology and the integrity of their evidence.

Wickramasinghe is not doing the panspermia theory any favors.  Whether or not 
there is any validity to the theory is trumped by his questionable methods.  
Also, publishing anything at all in the so-called "Journal of Cosmology" is not 
the way to gain any respect or consideration.

A lot of people want to believe that panspermia played a role in the 
development of life on Earth and elsewhere - it's an enticing and romantic idea 
that opens many doors of possibility for the frequency of life in the cosmos.  
But Wickramasinghe is not convincing me of this.  I bet the credible proponents 
of the theory wish they could squelch this guy, because he is adding a lot 
noise to the panspermia signal.

Best regards,

MikeG

PS - I do happen to believe in "panspermia", but please don't put me in 
Wickramasinghe's camp.  ;)

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone Pinterest - 
http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-------------------------------------------------------------



On 3/12/13, Count Deiro <countde...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> I haven't read Wickramasinge. I do hold stock in panspermic theory. In
> particular, the findings of water, amino acids, etc. in the meteorites I
> mentioned. The NASA/JPL paper "New Evidence of Life Forms in Martian
> Meteorites" descibing and illustrating what seven of their best have
> concluded are life forms in Nakhla and AH84001 was particularly convincing
> to me.
>
> That SUV sized lab that we spent a few hundred million to put on Mars, was
> sent there for the admitted purpose of solving our disagreement for us. You
> may have watched and listened to the first report of Curiosity's findings
> today streamed on the web. The Nasa team was about to pee their pants having
> the opportunity to confirm that in the first drilling of a rock on Mars,
> they have proven an environment existed that would have beeen amiable to
> life.
>
> It will get better....
>
> Regards,
>
> Guido
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum <dori...@embarqmail.com>
>>Sent: Mar 12, 2013 9:42 AM
>>To: Count Deiro <countde...@earthlink.net>, Galactic Stone & Ironworks
>> <meteoritem...@gmail.com>
>>Cc: Mike Groetz <mpg4...@gmail.com>, Meteorite List
>> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Astrobiologists Find Ancient Fossils
>> inFireballFragments
>>
>>Hello Count,
>>
>>All that stuff has been debunked long ago, no need to beat dead  horses.
>>That is unless some new evidence has been discovered. If you have new
>>evidence, I'd love to hear it.
>>
>>Seriously, you think the work of Chandra Wickramasinghe is worthy of
>>discussion? Please proceed.....
>>
>>Phil Whitmer
>>Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Count Deiro" <countde...@earthlink.net>
>>To: "Galactic Stone & Ironworks" <meteoritem...@gmail.com>; "Joshua Tree
>>Earth & Space Museum" <dori...@embarqmail.com>
>>Cc: "Mike Groetz" <mpg4...@gmail.com>; "Meteorite List"
>><meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:32 PM
>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Astrobiologists Find Ancient Fossils
>>inFireballFragments
>>
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> Meteorite Mike has said ".. are hereby suspended..." and Phil wrote
>>> "..too
>>> dumb to discuss.."
>>>
>>> Darn. I was hoping to sell my Nakhla, Murchison and Allende specimens, to
>>>
>>> mention just a few.
>>>
>>> Wait till all those guys and gals, with the three letters after their
>>> names, engaged in writing and publishing papers supporting the presence
>>> of
>>> fossilized nano-bacteria, biomorphs and elements that postulate
>>> pansermia,
>>> find out that their work "is too dumb to discuss"!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Count Deiro
>>> IMCA 3536
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritem...@gmail.com>
>>>>Sent: Mar 12, 2013 7:59 AM
>>>>To: Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum <dori...@embarqmail.com>
>>>>Cc: Mike Groetz <mpg4...@gmail.com>, Meteorite List
>>>><meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Astrobiologists Find Ancient Fossils in
>>>>FireballFragments
>>>>
>>>>All ancient life-bearing meteorites, diatom-bearing meteorites,
>>>>red-rain particles, and panspermia chondrites are hereby suspended
>>>>until further notice....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
>>>>Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
>>>>Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
>>>>Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
>>>>RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 3/12/13, Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum <dori...@embarqmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> Too dumb to even discuss!
>>>>>
>>>>> Phil Whitmer
>>>>> Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Mike Groetz" <mpg4...@gmail.com>
>>>>> To: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:17 AM
>>>>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Astrobiologists Find Ancient Fossils in
>>>>> FireballFragments
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.technologyreview.com/view/512381/astrobiologists-find-ancient-fossils-in-fireball-fragments/
>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>>
>>>>______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>>Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to