This is the same old shtick. Just another way to confuse what has to be learned the hard way, by educating yourself before considering the purchase of ANY "meteorite".
Who or what is trustworthy? It isn't obvious. This sounds like a case that allows for confusion and defends chaos rather than finding fault with the problems that can never be solved by buying anything other than substantial specimens from who/whom at all? Misrepresentation will always be there whether intentional or not. IMCA was a worthy attempt to establish integrity but in the end the IMCA can only control their own. There are endless swindlers in this world and crumb buying is an almost certain waste of money. It has and will continue to add pollution to meteorite collecting forever. ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list