There isn't enough information to reach a conclusion. The original masses and how they were assembled prior to fragmentation are missing values and presently beyond valid modeling.
However, interesting observation. Eman --- Thaddeus Besedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Polujamki and Markovka fell within kilometers of > each other and share all macroscopic petrographic > features except for two striking differences: > Polujamki, in photos I have found and in my > specimen, seems to have, almost without exception, a > much higher frequency of >3mm pools of coalesced > Fe-Ni, as well as relatively more extensive shock > veining/brecciation. Is this simply an observation > made from a specific paired stone that became > available recently? Can the amount of elemental > metal dissemination in the original meteoroidal body > have been bimodally segregated due to localized > shock, contributing to the differences in trajectory > of individual fragments of the stone as a result of > explosive aerial fragmentation? > > _______Total Iron > Content__________________________________ > Polujamki: 25.69 % > > http://www.crystalencounters.com.au/poluyamki.html > Markovka: 25.48% > http://www.minresco.com/meteor/meteor10.htm > -Thaddeus > __________________________________________________ > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list