On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: > >They dismiss the radiocarbon dates by claiming that the wood samples >were somehow magically contaminated by the impact. I say magically, >because there is not a practical way that an impact, especially an imaginary >one, could have contaminated the wood samples buried by the landslide. >
There is a simpler way to identify the story as flawed-- it is published by Adventures Unlimited. http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/ (The common thread between all Adventures Unlimited publications-- all fringe crap that would never see the light of day with a mainstream publisher). ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list