On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Chris Messina wrote:
I disagree, but then I've always been a fan of DLs. The problem that I
see with only using <q> <cite> and <bq> is that they're ways of
loosely pairing a speaker and what they've said. I don't know of any
way to closely couple the two.
At least with DT and DD there's a clear correlation for the speaker
with her/his words:
speaker 1:
something that speaker 1 said
speaker 2:
something that speaker 2 said
Thats why you use a list:
<ol>
<li><cite>Chris Messina</cite> <q>A chat is a list of
definitions.</q></li>
<li><cite>Kevin Marks</cite> <q>No, a chat is a list of
quotations.</q></li>
</ol>
Which has a very nice default rendering.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
