In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frances Berriman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 07/12/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Both Mars and the Moon have been in the news this week: >> Where are we, with the 'Mars': >> >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/mars> >> >> and 'Luna': >> >> <http://microformats.org/wiki/luna> >> >> proposals? >back atch'ya! You appear to be the major >contributor to both of these proposals, so where are you with them? I've done everything I think I can (please let me know if I've missed something) and am waiting for some response from "the community". >What specific problems are causing hold-ups, if any? So far as I can see, the issues are: * should these be subsets of "geo" (i.e. add an extra class to geo, indicating which body is being referred to); or stand-alone (I'm happy either way; using the former may produce nonsensical results in existing parsers; this might be deemed of little concern). * should there be a class to indicate the mapping convention being used, or should the uF specify a default (as, I believe, is done with geo)? (Of course, there could be a "default unless otherwise stated", meeting both needs). * lack of involvement from the relevant space scientists, not least as addressed in discussion (and apparent rejection by this community - or is the jury still out?) of the potential use of a dedicated mailing list. * naming issues (if any remain, I think they are relatively trivial and easily resolvable). Do you think a "straw man" might be due? -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss