In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Colin
Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Tagging is probably a better uF for this, IMO. I like the idea, but
>someone pointed out (before the post on this list) that it's the wrong
>semantics for @rel. For the semantic web to go further, we really do
>need to respect the semantics established in standards documents.
I thought tagging was for tagging the current page, not labelling a link
to a second page.
How would you tag:
<p>
Here's a
<a href="http://example.com/kitten.jpg";>fluffy kitten</a>
and here's a
<a href="http://example.com/porn.jpg";>pornographic nude</a>
</p>
?
--
Andy Mabbett
Merry Bloomin' Christmas!
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
![http://example.com/kitten.jpg"](http://example.com/kitten.jpg"){kind=link}
![http://example.com/porn.jpg"](http://example.com/porn.jpg"){kind=link}