--- Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > >any general opinions or thoughts on the "latitude longitude shorthand"? > > Thought will need to be given to how that is transferred to off-world > locations. This may mean requiring separate lat & long markup for such > places, or the use of type-value pairs: > > <span class="geo"> > <span class="type">Moon</span> > <span class="value">12.345;01.987"</span> > <\span> > > otherwise an additional class, say, "coordinates": > > <span class="geo"> > <span class="body">Moon</span> > <span class="coordiantes">12.345;01.987"</span> > <\span> >
It might be better to introduce a "reference-system" property that could be meaningful for both terrestrial and extra-terrestrial places, for which such reference systems exist. That would enable coordinate representation in other projection systems (like UTM) too. Dimitrios ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
