On 6/28/07, Pelle W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would say that Microformat = XML and therefor you say that "this reads microformats" as much as you can say "this reads XML".
Well, microformats are one thing and XML is another so Microformat != XML. Or do you mean "Terminology-wise/linguistically can be used in the same", in which case I ask "does anyone say 'this reads XML'" as a _marketing_ term. We already have a perfectly good technical name for microformats, i.e. "microformats". On 6/28/07, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Contact-aware browser; Calendar-aware browser; Geo-aware browser; etc...
Because whatever term is invented, it will probably take 5 years to get into people's heads. Having a pile of different terms won't make this process any easier and will probably hinder/kill it. On 6/28/07, Tim Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Microformats are bits of human readable data tagged so that a machine can do something with it. Tagging is already a common expression of a way of labelling content. content being many things, microformats being a way to tag many things. So how about tag-aware?
Because microformats are _not_ tags. -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss