In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 5/2/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In message >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David >> Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >If you mean what most people do by "title", then FN is the correct >> >thing to use. >> >> >> How does that square with the principle of making things easier for >> publishers? "title" (or "movie-title" or "job-title", or whatever) is >> surely easier for publisher to remember, and more obvious when updating >> code, than the awful "FN"! >> >> How is "FN" supported, in preference to "title " or "*-title" by the >> evidence gathered? > >Did you even read what I wrote Andy? Yes; you asserted that, in a certain circumstance, ' "FN" is the correct thing to use'. I then asked you justify that; in relation to making things easy for publishers, and in relation to the evidence gathered so far. You appear to have done neither. -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new