In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On May 8, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Chris Griego wrote:
>
>> rel-enclosure was ruled out because it's not always a download, but
>> sometimes a way to purchase, right? What if hAudio suggested the use
>> of rel-enclosure for downloads and rel-payment for ways to purchase?
>
>I think this is an excellent idea. In addition to re-using existing
>microformats, knowing whether a link is a direct download or a
>purchase form would allow tools to provide more useful options to
>users.
I can foresee problems.
Suppose a publisher links to a third-party site, offering an audio track
as a free sample (or vice versa). Later, that latter site decides to
start charging for the track - how would the publisher know that their
site is no longer correct?
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
