In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>If "audio-title" or "audiotitle" violates namespace principles here, >then I think we are seriously hitting one of the scaling problems of >uF. We have a precedent in honorific-prefix honorific-suffix (ironically, the former might be called "title"!) >Of course, it has been argued that uF isn't supposed to scale and >perhaps this is one of those areas where the namespace and scoping >principles induce a boundary on scale. If that's really the point we >are at, can someone explain why this is a good thing again? I think it was "not invented here". >In other words, hCard parsers would have to be re-written to handle >contained hAudios. Am I following that argument correctly? If so, I >don't quite understand the problem because hCard's don't contain >hAudio. Or can they? Suppose I make my autobiographical web page an hCard, using: class="vcard" That's valid. then suppose I decide to include on my page an mp3 of my new hit single... -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory UK ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new