I have to second this one as well.
In fact I blogged about this some time ago:
http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000583.html
nicely of course, but the reality was that for 2 years, I got slammed
and treated badly by the folks who started it, and then once I made
them sit down and explain the process, I was able to follow the
rules. But it was harsh. Many people commented privately to me
after the two blog posts on process that it helped them a lot because
they had the same experience.
I don't see why hazing helps the process. You can have high
standards without being mean.
mary
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Frances Berriman wrote:
On 12/09/2007, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should call it what it is:
"The Accepted Limitations of Microformats"
Yeah, that would work.
That harshness has also sent good people elsewhere... you don't
have to
be harsh to prevent frivolous formats or unwanted behavior. In fact,
this goes against the Microformats "be nice" principle.
I agree - and I think that these new pieces of documentation will help
everyone be more supportive rather than exclusive in any way.
--
Frances Berriman
http://fberriman.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
