In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> Many of us on the list agree with Tantek (including Me) that we SHOULD >use FN, the trouble is Some on the list want to use *Track* and >*audio-title* or *recording* because they believe the properties we are >trying to describe SHOULD mean something specific, which I tend to >disagree with, as the way I have proposed hAudio, *Item* contained >within hAudio is a *track* "fn" is fine, so long as it's clear (from a higher-level attribute) what is being named, as in this pseudocode: <li><track><fn>Speak to me</fn></track></li> <li><track><fn>Breathe</fn></track></li> <li><track><fn>On the Run</fn></track></li> <li><track><fn>Time</fn></track></li> Whereas that may be OK, this: <li><fn>Speak to me</fn></li> <li><fn>Breathe</fn></li> <li><fn>On the Run</fn></li> <li><fn>Time</fn></li> is not. Would we use "fn", though, if hCard had been created before vCard? >> I wonder though if we >> could maybe use item instead of track somehow ><span class="haudio"> > <span class="album">Best Before 1984</span> > <span class="contributor">Crass</span> > <span class="item"><span class="fn">Nagasaki Nightmare</ >span> – <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr></span> > <span class="item"><span class="fn">Nagasaki Nightmare</ >span> – <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr></span> > <span class="item"><span class="fn">Nagasaki Nightmare</ >span> – <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr></span> ></span> Item is semantically empty, other than as a container. We might as well say "thing". -- Andy Mabbett _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new